In an effort to control the country’s ballooning budget deficit, Pakistan’s government announced “plans to phase out politically sensitive fuel subsidies during the new financial year,” reported the Financial Times today. The news outlet added,
The government spent $2.4bn (€1.5bn, £1.2bn) during the fiscal year that ended yesterday to subsidize domestic fuel prices and protect consumers from rising global oil prices. But this has resulted in a rise in the budget deficit, which is expected to reach about 6.5 per cent of gross domestic product, leading to a rethink by government ministers.
One government minister told the FT, “The deficit is unsustainable…We have to pass on all the increase in fuel prices to our consumers. By December 2008, there [will] be no fuel-related subsidies in Pakistan.” According to the AFP, the government, “amid spiraling global oil prices,” raised natural gas prices by 31 percent and petrol prices by up to 20 percent this week to help reduce the deficit. However, the FT reported, “Prices of diesel and kerosene, which are used by far more people, would have to be raised by much more [55-58% and 75-80% respectively], prompting fears of unrest.”
Although the decision to raise fuel prices amid an already burgeoning food crisis promises to further antagonize the Pakistani public, Pakistani PM Yousaf Raza Gilani defended the measure on Tuesday, asserting that “his government wouldn’t flinch from unpopular measures needed to stabilize the economy,” reported Reuters. Gilani told reporters today, “Our government is committed to restoring macroeconomic stability in a reasonable timeframe…Economic liberalization, deregulation and privatisation in a transparent manner will be the core principles of our economic reform agenda.”
Despite these assurances, the rise in the price of petrol was the fifth increase for Pakistanis in four months, noted the BBC. The news agency added, “A liter of petrol now costs 75.69 Pakistani rupees ($1.11), compared with 53.70 in February. Diesel is now 49.05 a liter and a kilogram of compressed natural gas, which many people in South Asia use for cooking, costs 52 rupees.” Moreover, soaring oil and food prices “have pushed inflation in Pakistan to its highest level in more than 30 years,” a development that has deeply affected the country’s population, in particular the poor and middle income people.
To make matters potentially worse, Dawn reported Wednesday, “A ‘calculation/conversion error’ admitted by the federal government in announcing a 13 Rupee increase in price of compressed natural gas (CNG) could have earned gas stations windfall gains overnight, but consumers lost millions of rupees.” Officials “woke up to the error” about 20 hours late, issuing a clarification that the intended increase was actually 5.58 Rupees a kilogram. Although the government “regretted” the inconvenience this mistake may have caused, Dawn quoted some local consumers who were (not surprisingly) outraged. One local Pakistani told the news agency, “It shows the government’s incompetence and its non-serious attitude towards the people already hit hard by price hikes.” [Image from the BBC]



[...] Link to the original site [...]
Ain’t we missing Mush era already …
[...] gas prices, news outlet, pakistanis, petrol prices, reform agenda, transparent manner Read more at: CHUP! – Changing Up Pakistan This post has 0 [...]
Yes i agree, just 2 years back dollar was stable, economy was moving forward, stocks were higher, now everything is back to where it use to before musharraf took over.
[...] by Kalsoom – CHUP These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]
I have to strongly disagree with both of you. The economic problems that Pakistan faces didn’t suddenly materialise during the last five months. These problems were created during Musharraf’s time and while it’s easier and more convenient to blame things on the current government (although, undoubtedly, it has its faults as well), you cannot dismiss Musharraf’s part in the country’s problems.
it will be interesting to see if the Pakistani government ctually is “committed to restoring macroeconomic stability in a reasonable timeframe…Economic liberalization, deregulation and privatisation in a transparent manner .” Since these problem are mainly affecting the middle class and the poor (many of whom are essentially starving to death bc of food inflation) I doubt these items are topping the economic reform agenda any time soon. Musharraf isnt perfect but at least people weren’t starving to death during his reign.
You can’t entirely blame the MUSH era for the economic problems. Fuel prices and food shortages are a GLOBAL problem right now.
Right it is a global crisis – but shouldn’t the government be doing more to alleviate the stress placed on the lower classes in Pakistan given the already burgeoning civil unrest? Somehow I think “accidentally” increasing the price of gas to 13 rupees/kg instead of 5.58 is a pretty big mistake.
And although the economy was better under Musharraf, we have to remember that was also for a period during his eight years in power – in fact, many of the economic problems we see now surfaced while his party was still in power.
The error in the price increase is ridiculous. However, the issue is whether the government should continue to pursue this free market strategy by removing subsidies and carrying on with privatization or they should increase intervention by providing assistance to the lower classes in Pakistan despite an already strained budget.
things started to go wrong or worse right after the care-taker govt took over….. believe it or not, businessmen feel more secure and comfortable investing under Musharraf era, that speaks volume about ‘people’ ’s trust in him… Pakistan is not the kind of country that you leave in the hands of insane politicians — i had long predicted that as soon as musharraf leave people would call his era the best ever in the pakistan’s history.
Are people calling it the best ever? All I’ve heard recently is accusations, blame, and condemnation.
^ then you haven’t heard the truth
I m totaly in agreement with Mr. Imran, as i m related to Investmeting banking i can vouch for that. But what the solution? Is going back to autocratic rule is our only option?
I agree too.But i m never going to call MUSH’s era the best one.Every problem that we are facing today has its roots in MUSH era.