The recent developments in Swat Valley [see here for CHUP's related posts] have garnered significant media attention, both among Western and Pakistani media outlets, [not to mention among Pakistani blogs - see Grand Truck Road and A Reluctant Mind]. What is both notable and significant, though, is the media’s continued portrayal of the oft-neglected, human side of the conflict. Recently, Al Jazeera English released a piece by Kamran Rehmat of Dawn News entitled, “Swat: Pakistan’s Lost Paradise.” He quoted Zubair Torwalli, a social activist in Swat, who noted, “The police are escorted by the army personnel and come out of their hideouts for a couple of hours…One of the busiest squares, Grain Chowk, was renamed by shopkeepers as Khooni (bloody) Chowk because when they come to their shops in the morning, they find four or five bodies hung over the poles or trees. The bodies are usually headless.” Rehmat also relayed a story told by GEO Television talk show host Hamid Mir:
Mir describes an episode in which a widow, who taught at a private school in Mingora, was warned by the extremists to stop coming out of her house, let alone teach. Having no other means to feed her three children, she begged a religious scholar to intercede with the extremists, one of whom was a former student of the scholar. However, the commander of the extremists was so annoyed that he had the scholar arrested immediately, before banishing him from Mingora. Days later, the widow was executed by the extremists after being declared a prostitute.
A recently released documentary by ActionAid Pakistan entitled, “Voices Unheard – Behind Politics of Conflict,” provided some startling statistics – more than 400 schools have shut down in Swat alone – “depriving almost 10,000 girls of their right to education.” An ongoing BBC News series, “Diary of Pakistani schoolgirl,” follows the story of one of these females. On January 22, the seventh grader wrote:
Maulana Shah Dauran also said in his speech on FM radio that three ‘thieves’ will be lashed tomorrow and whoever wants to see can come and watch. I am surprised that when we have suffered so much, why people still go and watch such things? Why also doesn’t the army stop them from carrying out such acts? I have seen wherever the army is there is usually a Taliban member nearby, but where there is a Taliban member the army will always not go.
[Taliban public flogging in Swat]
In her most recent entry, dated January 28, she reported that her family safely left Swat for Islamabad, where they are staying with her father’s friend. The schoolgirl spoke of an encounter with a popcorn vendor at Lok Virsa, who “said that he hailed from Momand Agency, but because of an ongoing military operation was forced to leave his abode and head for the city. At that moment I saw tears in my parents’ eyes.”
The conflict in Pakistan’s northern areas has translated to an increasing number of IDPs – Internally Displaced Persons. According to The News, the aforementioned ActionAid film found that over 40,000 IDPs are living in inhuman conditions in camps. The news agency added, “The film captures people living in deplorable conditions in IDP camps, looking at the government to control extremists’ activities so that peace can prevail in their hometowns and their lives can return to normalcy [and] …return home someday.” The Daily Times, in its coverage of the film, noted, “Without emphasizing expert opinions, the film was meant to initiate an analytical dialogue about socio-political and economic consequences of conflicts. At one place, a woman grieved the death of her three grown-up sons, while another chokingly narrated how bombs had smashed her husband.”
The on-the-ground coverage and the civilian testimonies are important because they humanize the conflict. Reading these accounts, the fear these people experience on a daily basis is almost palpable – it practically jumps off the page. The stories should motivate all of us to take some kind of action, whether it’s initiating a dialogue or providing warm clothing and funds to the people in these camps. Dawn’s Irfan Husain, in his recent piece, echoed my sentiments exactly:
In a sobering piece on this page last week, Zubeida Mustafa underlined the plight of the people of Swat, and asked why there were no large protests against the killers who were terrorising the valley. Why not indeed? It is a sad fact that while we Pakistanis are (rightly) incensed over the recent assault on Gaza, and other attacks on Muslims by non-Muslims, we choose to turn a blind eye by even worse Muslim-on-Muslim atrocities.

I do not understand why Army is scared of these bigots? Having a such a big army and air-force and sophisticated weapons, why is it keeping silent? I do think now Pakistan should snatch away the gun from US and its allies and lead the march. US should just provide the intelligence and surveillance. In process, some able men of Pakistan army would lose their life, but they are meant for this job.
There should be some mass movements involving all the political parties and people against these tyrants. It was pity to see mass displacement pictures on Dawn portal where old are being carried on “charpai”.
Pakistani younger generation should be built afresh with humanistic values, real patriotism, undistorted history, role models of society, economic progression.
[...] url: “http://teabreak.pk/the-human-cost-of-pakistan-s-conflict-42/13932/” }); Read more at: CHUP! – Changing Up Pakistan actionaid pakistan, al jazeera, al jazeera english, army personnel, bbc news, chowk, chup, [...]
Hi Kalsoom, I went thru a few releases and the comments (also the battles or discussions in it
) in your blog while gathering some info about swat. I dont want to comment on anything in particular but my dear friend yours is a very tough job and you are doing good. Keep it up, God bless you.
Hey I hail from India, dose it matter much?
with best wishes,
Vipin.
Thank you Vipin, I really appreciate it! And of course it doesn’t matter where you’re from! At least not to CHUP.
Very moving piece, Kalsoom! I love your blog for articles like this, which expose these stories and shed light on a small corner of the world that could otherwise go unnoticed by Westerners. I agree with Vipin, yours is a difficult job but a noble one and I commend you for this article in particular.
@ Ravi, I think you have hit on something- with all Pakistan’s military power why can’t they get rid of these thugs? Why can’t 12,000 military troops with guns and planes defeat 4,000 upstarts? The US has been asking the same questions for years in Afghanistan and Iraq, and before that in Vietnam. If you have the answers to this please send it to me or write a book on it and earn a fortune in royalties.
You say Pakistan should “snatch away the gun from the US,” but as I understand it and according to Dawn, the US is not involved in security or military operations in Swat (see: http://www.dawn.com/2009/01/30/top1.htm) other than pressuring the Pakistanis to crack down on the “thugs.” So I guess I misunderstood your point about US involvement… please clarify.
Another great piece Kalsoom! The personal stories definitely humanize the situation.
But to those who call for foreign boots on the ground in Swat, I think it’s important to remember that the problem is an internal Pakistani one. It puts absolutely no responsibility on the tax-payers of foreign countries. No more so than any criminal group engaged in extortion anywhere. It’s a local police matter, not an international military matter.
And to those who call for more Pakistani military intervention: I think one must be careful not to give away liberties for the sake of security, which an Army presence would almost certainly do to the people in Swat. The local police obviously needs more funding and a new directive. When Pablo Escobar was killing thousands of policemen, judges, and lawmakers in Colombia in the 70s and 80s, an order was issued by the Colombian police to summarily execute anyone even remotely associated with Escobar. This worked extremely well and did not result in martial law, despite the fact that the writ of the state was being challenged as well. Escobar disagreed with Colombian extradition laws, while Taliban’s understanding of Sharia law causes them to disagree with Pakistani laws. And I would say Escobar had even more political legitimacy than Taliban does (to people like Rafay) with his Liberal Party and national media outlets. The criminals in Swat are not a foreign army and should not be treated as such. They could be summarily executed by a beefed up police force, that should do the trick!
Thanks guys!
I’m trying to dig around for ways to contribute or donate money to support the IDPs (or the people in general), and my only option is contacting your local Edhi center – http://www.edhifoundation.com/contact.asp, or ActionAid Pakistan, http://www.actionaid.org/pakistan/
If anyone has any better suggestions please let me know!
Great piece Kalsoom. I am glad that you are highlighting the problem of IDPs. This problem has been significant in other conflict ridden countries such as Palestine, Uganda, Sudan etc., but most people don’t know that it is a growing problem in Pakistan which will have severe consequences. IDP camps always become a recruiting ground for extremism, violence against women and usually a public health risk. Glad you wrote about it.
@ Organised propaganda is used by Zoros of media in
service to Batilans and their clients and the likes
(one can observe) fabricated stunt for indoctrinating
Islamophobia.
@ Heather,
hahahahahahahah you make me laugh !!
your argument strange logic carrys
” State department legacy ” brand
interpreted by Neocons, farwarded by aipac.
@ HGW,
Pablo Escobar was an American agent, but in 70s
youforgot completely there was certain
Salvadore Allegende of Chile ???
The only way to establish normal life in Afghanistan
Fata, NWFP is to eliminate American invaders,
genociders, nazis-zionist armed thugs.
What are “Zoros of media”?
Rafay-
No, Escobar was not an American agent.. the CIA supported the movement to remove him during the War on Drugs era. They provided intelligence, arms, and tracking equipment to the pro-west Colombian government. You have your facts entirely wrong, stop rewriting history to justify your sick political sympathies. You’re a full-blown terrorist sympathizer and if you lived in Swat, they should target you! People like you empower these criminals by giving them moral legitimacy!
@Rafay, always happy to entertain.
@Kalsoom, I assumed “Zoros of media” referred to George Soros. Just a guess. What continues to befuddle me is “Batilans.” I actually googled it and all the hits were Rafay’s posts on this blog, or a location in Indonesia. Still not sure what Batilans refers to.
To more serious matters, @HGW, completely agree about the dangers of cracking down on the population and sacrificing liberties for the sake of security. That would only help their cause. As for the idea of “foreign boots on the ground,” while it is an internal matter for Pakistan to deal with, you know anything having to do with the Taliban will draw US interest, as was demonstrated by US pressure on Pakistan to step up its security in Swat. The new Administration is showing a very strong committment to Afghanistan, and just today said they wanted to focus more on defeating al Qaeda and the Taliban than on building democracy in the region. Also, with 2 primary supply routes to Afghanistan cut in the past few days the US is going to rely even more heavily on Pakistani security. Wouldn’t be surprised if this develops into “justification” for greater US involvement in Swat (not saying I agree with that, just throwing it out there for people to chew on).
Heather, I think Batilans is actually “Taliban,” just with the letters mixed around since Rafay (Rafay correct me if I’m wrong) feels there should be a distinction between the Taliban that use violence and pervert Islam (the Batilans) and those who are still legitimate.
Kalsoom, I don’t think Rafay feels that Taliban have perverted Islam in any way, just look at his radical comments regarding “liquidation” of Americans and such.
@HGW,
its always the same story, the man is, or is not ?
just like the “drug dealer” President of Panama ?
You know there is Latin American country called
CHILE and who’s President was assassinated
by American CIA ? you forgot so quickly,mate !!
Americans think they can fool around with their
theories of who is who ? All the dictators in the
world are at the payroll of CIA, once not useful,
chuck them away !! disown them !! Escobar was
only one of such case !
@ Heather,
ha ha ha very funny !
wonder if you can locate Indonesia ? you know
where is it ? btw !
The term Batilan is universal arab/persian/Turkish,
origin, ‘ Baatil’ = opposite of Truth, falshood, deceit.
The heralds of such are called Batilans
means
THE BAND OF FAKE ,
THE BAND OF EVIL,
ANTI-GOD, SATANIC PERVERSE, KILLERS
Now you understand perhaps, who are the members
of INTRNATIONAL CONSORTIUM OF TERRORISM
called, BA T I L A N S ( S is used to indicate plural).
They are :
CIA, Mossad, Raw, Mi6, khad, Takfiris, Tehrikis and their
dependants.
@ Kalsoom,
this has nothing to do with Talibans,
Talib = a student, plural = taliban (without ‘s’ )
Talibans sent to Afghanistan and NWFP with the
” Ashirvad ” of Benazir and Bill Clinton in 1994 .
Every where all the evil carrys ” made in USA” .
@ Eman,
oh la la ! what problem with IDPs ! what do you
suggest to do to them, send drones to liquidate them !
as you say they can be potential extremist recruits.
they will get justice !! they should no ? even if
the grey-matter inside your skull turn into yoghurt.
Goodluck
@Rafay,
You’re like a broken record. You blame everything on a foreign source. We all know how geopolitics works. However, that still doesn’t mean that we do not have our own responsibilities within our country. Personally, I think you like to disagree for the sake of disagreeing. If I wrote that Rafay is an intelligent person…you would probably argue that you weren’t intelligent, but rather its an American conspiracy. You should go join the Taliban, but they’ll even be annoyed by your bumbling rants.
@ hey, keep on buttering Americans, why do
you bother with subjects not your concern.
” We all know how geopolitics work “, oh really ?
yes, it works, just like your dairy farm’s buttering
politics !!! please go back to your cows.
Rafay-
I’ve asked this before, but I’m REALLY curious – I have gathered you live in Europe – when was the last time you went back to Pakistan?
@Rafay,
I’m not an American, nor do I live on a farm. Your comment made no sense. Goes to show your limited capacity in taking criticism. Pakistan is my concern…therefore this subject is my concern. If you want to be taken seriously, quit acting like a child and engage in proper dialogue rather than throwing a tantrum anytime anyone says anything.
Rafay is ignorant to almost every single subject, it’s just pathetic Butters. It seems he has never read a book or a newspaper in his entire life.
Rafay likes to comment on subjects for which he is TOTALLY CLUELESS. I know children with a better understanding on world politics. Every single “fact” that he tries to express is not only wrong, it makes no logical sense.
Rafay you need to return to the dark alleys and subways tunnels from which you came, you rambling homeless person. With every word that comes out of your mouth, you reveal more and more that you are in likelihood developmentally disabled.
[...] areas has translated to an increasing number of internally displaced persons (IDPs)”, reports CHUP! – Changing Up Pakistan. Posted by Rezwan Print version Share [...]
It makes me feel fuzzy when my articles on serious topics like IDPs and the Swat conflict inevitably degenerate into mud-slinging and name-calling. Sigh.
I’m a regular reader of this blog and while I do tend to disagree with what Rafay has to say a lot of the time (and especially disagree with the WAY he says it ), I think its totally uncalled for to say he is a HOMELESS PERSON and/or DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. Let’s not stoop to name calling.
Thanks,
A fan of CHUP
Agreed- you guys, no one has to stoop to name-calling and mud-slinging, no matter how irritated or incensed you get by one another. Rise above!
@Heather,
Looks like I was not clear in my earlier posting. In my opinion, Pakistani Military is not completely owning up the operation “De-Talibanization” for some reasons. Couple of them could be: first, military may not be perceiving it as a greater threat to Pakistan by not extrapolating current problem against time. Second, though convinced it is a threat, it may be hurting to see american drones killing few innocents along with militants and also damaging the pakistani property. If I am a Pakistani, I would fight for eliminating the militants, but not as a package deal of few militants and few innocents. Moreover, having an alien force to do this job worsens the situation, by increasing the chances of error because of their unfamiliarity with the setup and culture. This would not be a right option for the people of Pakistan and also it complicates the matter further because it is national pride.
You may be wondering why US is not winning any war it has waged outside its soil; It is purely because US point of view is not just matching with the point of view of common man of the land. When that is done, you would get the results you wanted.
The reason I would say “gun to be snatched from US” is, it is no longer a problem just for US; Pakistan can no longer work on contract basis and look for reimbursement with folded hands. It needs to lead the war with complete ownership, it just alone needs to do it to escape from the trap of “waging somebody else’s war”.
Pak military is fooling Pakistani people and using there money for there own good. Hard money earned by pakistani and help from international community ment for people’s help is deleberatly diverted towards purchasing arms.
There is been massive corruption by military men..
Please wake up and strenthen ur democratic setup and raise voise against military and Talibans…
@Rafay is full supporter of Taliban’s .. I sometimes wonder if he is one of them??
are u rafay ?? best way to beat him is to ignore his comments and reply to reasonable voices.
@Kalsoom, I found your forum quite impartial and honest..
keep your good work…
we choose to turn a blind eye by even worse Muslim-on-Muslim atrocities.
Thank you sutch!
Ravi, thanks for that clarification, I’m even more inclined to agree with you now. Great perspective! Yes, it can be embarassing to have a foreign country conduct operations on your turf; and yes, for the past 8 years the US has done very little to understand foreign perspectives or the situation on the ground; and I also would be pretty peeved if foreign drones were killing civilians in my country (but to clarify, as far as I know there have been no drone attacks in Swat, those are primarily in Waziristan). But I’m going to stick with my earlier point… despite all these caveats, the US has way too much at stake politically to pick up and let Pakistan handle the Taliban alone. You said it yourself, Pakistan is not taking ownership of operations to “De-Talibanize” the region, and until they step up I don’t see the US backing off. I read one report that said these areas are not under the control of the Pakistani government, and according to international law any ungoverned territory is subject to attacks. At the same time, the last thing the US wants is to get dragged into another foreign conflict, which is what the drone attacks threaten to do.
What the US should do is try to understand the Pakistani perspective better (see above caveats), and rethink these drone operations. Is the cost in political clout and civilian support really worth the benefits of killing a couple Taliban who Pakistan should be cleaning up anyways?
On a side note, I saw that on Jan. 24 Zardari asked the US to cease drone attacks, and since then I haven’t seen any reports of them. Has anyone else?
@Dear Sutch,
I found your opinion about Pak army very biased,
partial and based on rumours, like some of commenters,
you never bother to give any figures or numbers of arms
sold, just like we all know how many civilians are armed
in US !.
I don’t know why do you want your favorites in Pakistan
to go against your unfavorites !! ( including myself),
for your info, I do not chose my political favorites upon
listening to American fake analysis on any country’s politics.
Talibans PPP ANP and MQM are not my ideals ” rolemodel”.
You sound very ” afraid ” of me,
ignoring me ! that you can not afford !
reasonable voices ! where are they ?
@ The poor HGW, don’t know if he is American ? or
what is his background ? replaced proud one, who
vanished !!
My comments were a bit too harsh for him, could’nt bear,
thats the lowest he could go, anyway my comments
against Batilans are appriciated by many, some are
simply shy don’t evaluate my accussations and critics.
Many could’nt believe some one can shout against US ?
accuse them, with atrocious crimes, simply, because
we are not use to, you need to have courage and
audacity, outspoken, not, yes Sir, you are right, Sir.
I have even written comments on this blog
against Talibans, Takfiris, Tehrikis, and Kharijites.
Some are irritated, watching my victims, their favorites !!
accused of such hideous crimes !
as simple as that,
one must defend his/her country with all open and even
atrocious way.
I am aware of my country’s negatives, but I will never
let anyone go with only anti-Pakistan or anti-muslim
comments, exclusive Pak-bashing ?
no way !!
They never criticise their stooges in Pakistan,
US Ambassador, Sec. of State, the fats and thins, they
all freely visit, discuss, advise the Election Commisssioner
of Pakistan in his Functionning office, openly, with their
democratic smiles showing their ugly teeth.
@ Kalsoom,
just curious, I checked, I was victim of name calling
53 times on your blog, subtle insults are about 24,
absence of valid argument, instead personal insults.
Well then that needs to change Rafay. Everyone, no name calling/insulting ANYONE – keep things clean, keep it respectful, and most importantly, keep it about good discussion!
Rafay, I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I ALMOST agree with you: “one must defend his/her country with all open and even atrocious way. I am aware of my country’s negatives, but I will never let anyone go with only anti-Pakistan or anti-muslim comments, exclusive Pak-bashing”
That sentiment isn’t exclusive to Pakistanis…so when you are only anti-US, people will not let you get away with it and they will feel compelled to notify you of your hypocrisy (consider yourself notified) and ask that you please try to look at something from a different perspective. It’s a fun exercise, give it a try!
And if you really consider yourself a victim of name calling I will refer you to my above comment about hyprocisy and ask that you refrain from name-calling others.
It worries me deeply when ideas of absolute good and evil are contended by the twisted logic of certain self righteous individuals. There is no descent by anyone that acts such as slavery or sex trafficking are absolutely evil in an objective sense. But the idea that violence and intimidation can be used to achieve certain revolutionary/anti-state aims is becoming increasingly legitimized by a group of people who can only be described as sub-human terrorist sympathizers. Their opinions should be given the same credibility as talking points from the KKK, Neo-Nazis, advocates for ethnic cleansing, and the like. Although publicly expressing an approval of evil is protected under freedom of speech, it should be treated as a highly undesirable thing to do, and should be discredited by reasonable and caring observers. That being said, I think name-calling and ridicule is necessary to discourage such individuals from spreading purely evil propaganda, and to discourage soft-minded individuals from adopting similar evil viewpoints.
HGW, while I respect your logic – there are other methods of discouraging these individuals that do not involve name-calling and ridicule. Ultimately, what does name-calling do but incite the parties involve? It brings the debate to another level, one where neither side really listens nor cares what the other has to say.
Other options: 1. ignoring them. 2. probing their logic to find flaws in their argument and confuse their rationale.
I agree with you that ridicule, satire, and other sorts of negative associations will almost certainly take the debate to a level where neither side cares nor listens to each other. However, evil individuals are so deeply embedded in their own viewpoint that they are impervious to any probing of their logic. A digression to a lower level of debate is almost inevitable. Simply pointing out that the party is in fact promoting evil deeds does nothing to discourage them. While there is little hope of changing the minds of those who are purely evil at heart, is it morally objectionable to simply ignore them. What some reasonable and caring observers seek to achieve via ridicule or satire is to discredit evil parties in the eyes of a centrist disaffected public, not to debate directly with said parties.
@ what curious conversation,
yes, Kalsoom, you always respect every pro-American,
who is anti-Pakistan !!
HGW,
you said
” what some reasonable and caring observers
seek to achieve via ridicule or satire is to
discredit evil parties in eyes of a centrist……” !
well I am doing the same, discrediting evil anti-Pakistan
and anti-muslims !
how old are you ??
Case in point
@ Heather,
oh how nice of you agreeing with me !
atleast initially. You mean I should try other
perspectives, formulated by Batilan’s ??
Swat its called Switzerland of Pakistan, what happened in swat no one can believe, everything come to an end, a ordinary life of one local individual is lifeless, what our leaders are doing? There are making fun on it??? It’s not time to compose political principles
I want to appeal to all pray for our Pakistan and Pakistani people and also pray that our leaders get some sense to effort for Pakistan, they are member of staff of Pakistan they should work for Pakistan not for their own profit
To all the above described facts, I will add that its now the solely duty of every pakistani, if they wish to save their country and save their own people, joins hands from today and raise your voice. your politican, who is 100% corrupt and also been selected via unfair means, would not save you….you can save yourself only by yourself..