
Image Credit: NY Times
Today, President Barack Obama addressed the Muslim World at a speech at Cairo University in Egypt, [also see my lead-up post yesterday]. In the speech, he pledged to “seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world,” imploring America and the Islamic world to drop their suspicions of one another and forge new alliances to confront violent extremism and heal religious divides,” reported the NY Times. He asserted,
I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings…There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground. As the Holy Quran tells us, “Be conscious of God and speak always the truth.” That is what I will try to do – to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.
The U.S. President went on to relate this new resolve to his own upbringing, noting that although he is a Christian, his father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. He added, “As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith…So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t.”
The speech Thursday was not all rhetoric. Obama went on to detail his specific positions on Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On the topic of Pakistan, he emphasized, “We also know that military power alone is not going to solve the problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That is why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who have been displaced.” On Israel and Palestine, the President noted the U.S. bond with Israel was “unbreakable,” but also noted, “It is also undeniable that the Palestinian people – Muslims and Christians – have suffered in pursuit of a homeland.” According to the NY Times, “He offered no major initiatives on the Middle East peace process although he put Israelis and Palestinians on notice that he intends to deal directly with what he sees as intransigence on key issues, evoking the concerns of both parties but asking both to shift ground significantly.”
Obama’s address today was not groundbreaking or revolutionary, but he never claimed it would be. In fact, in an interview with NBC News’ Brian Williams that aired yesterday, the President stated,
I also don’t want to, you know, load up too many expectations on this speech. After all, one speech is not going to transform very real policy differences and some very difficult issues surrounding the Middle East and the relationship between Islam and the west…And the question then is how do we now go forward with a honest, serious relationship based on mutual respect and mutual interest?
The speech was powerful in its messaging. Obama demonstrated a true understanding of the ideological divide that currently exists between the U.S. and Islam, or the “Islamic World,” and exhibited a resolve to address this problem and change perceptions on either side. This marks a dramatic paradigm shift from the Bush adminstration era, which often polarized the conflict into an “us” versus “them” issue that only further exacerbated this divide. Obama attempted to bridge this gap throughout his speech, quoting the Quran not once, but three times and even noted that the first American Muslim elected to the U.S. Congress, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, “took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same Holy Quran that one of our Founding Fathers – Thomas Jefferson - kept in his personal library.” It was, as the NY Times noted, “the riskiest speech of his young presidency.”
The question that now remains is, will Obama carry out the foreign policy objectives he outlined in Cairo? Will they turn into concrete initiatives? Will his order to close Guantanamo Bay actually occur? And, in terms of Pakistan, [since that is the focus of this blog], will the $1.5 billion in aid finally move past Capitol Hill in Washington to our country? While all of these questions are up for debate, I will say that I was inspired by Obama’s speech. His presidency represents an attempt to rebrand America in order to better its perceptions throughout the world, not just among Muslims.
He also is redefining what it means to be an American – that a Muslim-American is just as American as anyone else. As he noted, “So let there be no doubt: Islam is a part of America. And I believe that America holds within her the truth that regardless of race, religion, or station in life, all of us share common aspirations – to live in peace and security; to get an education and to work with dignity; to love our families, our communities, and our God. These things we share. This is the hope of all humanity.” That point is important because it exemplifies a fundamental shift in the U.S. leadership that was not evident in the past eight years. What were your thoughts on the address?
If you missed the speech, you can watch the video below, or read the full transcript here.

I’m a little confused as to the popular opinion of the speech. Some news sources claim that it was met with great satisfaction by Arab leaders, others claim Arabs are less than impressed and are advising Obama not to “lecture them.” Can you give us some insight on this?
Thanks LM.
I’ll give two types of opinion that I found:
According to the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey of Americans who watched the address, 68 percent said their reaction to his address was extremely positive and another 24 percent somewhat positive. Also, 85 percent said his speech made them feel more optimistic about the country’s path in the next few years.
[Keep in mind though that the speech was at 6 am EST - Americans who were probably up that early to watch it were probably Obama supporters in the first place]
The BBC did a bunch of really good and interesting analysis, including where their correspondents summed up the sentiment in Muslim countries:
Barbara Plett in Islamabad said: Pakistanis welcome Barak Obama’s statement that military power alone won’t solve the problems in their region: that’s what they’ve believed for a long time. However, despite Washington’s commitments to increase civilian aid, what they mostly see is the use of force, particularly unpopular US air strikes in their border region.
BBC’s correspondent in Tehran said: Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Khameini was eager to get his message across even before President Obama spoke. A few beautiful words to Muslims around the world would not make any difference if America didn’t change its actions. Ayatollah Khameini’s efforts to preempt this initiative surely betray a certain nervousness in the Iranian leadership. They know that many Iranian people are intrigued by President Obama and enthusiastic for a reconciliation with the United States.
The Lebanon correspondent: But on the eve of the Lebanese election, his administration said that the US relationship with Lebanon, and its aid to the country, will depend on the outcome of the vote. Many here liked President Obama’s speech, it was, they say, powerful and different – but its not his words that President Obama will be judged by.
Also here is a link to more intl reactions to the speech: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8083171.stm
Reactions were positive for the most part, most ppl want to see if Obama’s actions follow up his rhetoric. Also negative reactions occurred from groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. but that’s completely expected – Obama, after all did speak out against extremism.
Great summary Kalsoom! I’m impressed by your quick turn around. Three things struck me. First, Obama’s tone- he is reviving idealism. It is an ambitious task but after 8 years of a listening to a village idiot I’m just happy to have someone up there with a vision and brain. The line, “We have the power to make the world we seek” really hit home with me.
Second, his stance on the Israel/Palestine conflict. While his policies on the surface resemble Bush’s and he says we have a strong bond with Israel, he is taking a much harder line on settlements. Maybe this is because of the change of government in Israel, but I see Obama really pushing back on this and saying, “We turned a blind eye for the past 10 years and now we want you to live up to your commitments.” The US bond with Israel is “unbreakable,” but that doens’t mean we won’t use it to pressure them to do what is right for us, them, the Palestinians, and the rest of the world. Check recent news reports for evidence of this, such as today’s NYT, “Israelis Say Bush Agreed to West Bank Growth”: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/world/middleeast/04israel.html?ref=world
And third, perhaps most importantly as an American, he is trying to undo the psychological and cultural damage done by George W. Bush to the American people. As Kalsoom noted, Bush took an Us VS Them stance towards Muslims and Obama is pointing out that this is not a zero-sum game. Bush told America that Muslim’s hated our freedoms, he implied they were to blame for September 11, and sowed the seeds of bigotry in the consciousness of average Americans. I’m still trying to re-educate my own family members on this issue. Obama is trying to touch that part of America that was affected by Bush’s statements and he’s telling them, “We can no longer afford to hate each other!” It was true to American values and, on a more selfish level, to our national interest since clearly the old way wasn’t working.
Thanks for your comments Heather!
As Reimas noted in the last post, Bush also took a stand against the settlements and it was the U.S. position outlined in the 2003 roadmap, BUT I think Obama’s rhetoric was a lot stronger this morning. For one, he used the word “occupation” in his speech, stating, “They endure the daily humiliations – large and small – that come with occupation.” He also used the word, Palestine rather than “the future Palestinian state.” All these changes may seem like small nuances, but they represent a dramatic shift in rhetoric, and hopefully tangible policy. We will have to see about that.
I thought Obama’s speech was fantastic. True, he didn’t outline any major initiatives on the Middle East peace process, but that wasn’t the speech’s focus. As a American Muslim, I have always believed that I was as American as the Italian Americans or Korean Americans. It’s fantastic to see a President who reiterates that very fact. After all, the US is the melting pot, and until the previous administration butchered Muslim-American relations, this wasn’t even an issue. But Obama is taking a step in the right direction.
The speech was not perhaps ‘groundbreaking or revolutionary in that it did not detail ‘the how’ of the new policy BUT I don’t think speeches are supposed to lay down blueprint of policies. What it does is to set the tone of the administration’s policy and to connect to the audience. If the speech incited and encouraged further dialogue between the two worlds, the speech achieved its objective. It remains to be seen but I think Obama did his part in taking the first (and big) step in reaching out to the Muslim world. Not only it was beautiful, I think it did achieve that goal.
I still think publically rejecting further Israeli settlement IS groundbreaking though…
[...] url: "http://teabreak.pk/obama-speaks-to-the-muslim-world-42/21150/" }); Read more at: CHUP! – Changing Up Pakistan azaan, barack obama, break of dawn, cairo university in egypt, chicago communities, common [...]
As President Obama correctly mentioned in his address that no single speech can eradicate years of mistrust. The task of reconciling Western and Islamic perceptions is a daunting one given the politicization of the issue. Despite the complexicity of his assignment, President Obama made an impressive beginning which will have to be validated through positive policies. President Obama’s attempts at citing injunctions from the Quran to highlight the progressive and tolerant nature of Islam were commendable. He went beyond the narrow political analysis of tracing the roots of tensions between the U.S. and Islam to 9/11. According to the President most of the current tensions have resulted from the historical developments prompted by the forces of Colonialism, Cold War and globalization. The high-point of President Obama’s speech was his attempt to project violent extremism as a common civilizational threat. President Obama skillfully repudiated the Clash of Civilizations theory by quoting the message of peace from the Torah, Bible and Quran. As an attempt at sociological reconciliation, President Obama’s Cairo speech was a grand success; the concrete process of political resolution is yet to begin.
http://thetrajectory.com/blogs/?p=584
I completely agree with Shamiela. The speech was not supposed to outline policy, it was supposed to set the tone and indicate a change in attitude.
On an overall basis, I absolutely LOVED what he said and am so happy to hear all the discussion going on in the US about the Muslim world.
This may not be too significant, but like the audience that clapped and whistled every time Obama said “shukran” or “Assalamalaikum” or even when he quoted the Quran…I was similarly extremely moved and appreciated the effort.
There have been many misunderstandings about Islam and Muslim culture since 9/11 and the subsequent increase in violence in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. I feel that Obama’s mention of our history, contribution to society and the quotes from the Quran about peace will go a long way in changing perceptions.
I just wish he had said HIJAB and not HAJIB
I cringed a little when I heard that, but it was a small blip. Blame the teleprompter…
Great speech! It takes two to tango. Let’s do it!
Gis (a Jew holding out her hand)
Kalsoon, was going to do a comment but it turned into a blog post.
http://saesneg.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/obama-does-cairo/
Okay call me a sucker, but when an American president talks about his Muslim background and the contributions of the early Islamic civilization and tells me he knows what an Azaan is, I cannot help but immediately warm up to him.
His speech was pleasant, it was refreshing, and it reminded me why Obama is such a great political leader (something I’d come to doubt in the last few months). But more than anything, I feel like he embodied the change (in attitude and dialogue) that he wanted to bring in the relationship between the Muslim world and the West. And I think it’s great that he did not put forward any concrete blueprint or make any far-reaching promises about tackling the Palestinian/Israeli issue. This speech needed to be an ice-breaker that emphasized the sincerity and determination of the new administration towards the Muslim world and I think he accomplished that.
Now we just have to wait and see how he builds on and strengthens this new relationship with the Middle East and the wider Muslim world.
Great comments everyone -
I agree, I think the real purpose of the speech was to set the tone for the administration’s future policy towards the Middle East and other Muslim countries (as well as Muslims throughout the world, including in America). I think a lot of critics are hammering him on the speech, but more ppl – especially Muslims – are praising his approach.
another great post, kalsoom. i wholeheartedly agree with your comment re the polarisation during the Bush years and how this new Administration is trying to undo that. What i found a bit worrisome (ominous) are the hidden messages re Pakistan- conditionalities, seeking out terrorists, etc etc. does this mean, they’ll “smoke them out” at all costs? makes me shudder when i think about what allbright said yrs ago (not that i am comparing him to her- i do like him a lot) “the cost was worth it”- when asked about children killed in the Iraq war. Hope this is not the case, once again.
I have not heard the speech but great comments. I was thinking of boycotting the speech because I think he could have done a better job if he gave the speech somewhere other than in Egypt. Here’s Mohsin Hamid on why he should have done that.
Pakistani writer Mohsen Hamid on NPR about Obama: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104894746&ft=1&f=1022
But then I thought about it and realized that I absolutely love it when Obama talks and maybe Cairo wasn’t such a bad idea given the Palestine issue being the epicentre of Muslim discontent.
But I definitely think that he should consider giving another speech this side of the world, maybe Indonesia, the largest Muslim country and there are more Muslims this side of Asia than the other side.
PS: Don’t come to Pakistan. Life in Pakistan would come to a standstill and we just can’t have that. Not with our economy in the doldrums.
Yawar,
You wanted to BOYCOTT the speech because it was in Egypt? Why?? His first speech to the Muslim World was from Turkey, so what if his second one is from Egypt. Hopefully the next one is in Indonesia.
We can criticize everything about the speech if we try. But the reality is that no U.S. president has ever made a speech like he did – it was televised all over the world – if we focus on the petty issues like where he decided to make the speech, we are undoubtedly missing the bigger picture.
O I completely agree with you, Kals. I wasn’t boycotting the speech because it was in Egypt despite what I wrote. I wasn’t boycotting it at all. I was just at work and read the text soon after.
Marvellous speech. Seriously, kudos to Obama.
The speech is important primarily because of how it signals the seemingly new approach of the US towards the Muslim world, after the fun stuff we have all seen and ridiculed and gotten frustrated with in the past 8-9 years.
Just for that reason alone, him saying loud and clear, “the Bush era is hopefully behind us” it holds value. Let’s see how it translates, and how he is able to move the massive US state machinery in the same direction.
Hey nice post. Just wanted to point out as far as Hamas is concerned, there are some mixed reports about their reaction. One of their representatives gave high praise for the speech going as far as saying it was Martin Luther King-esque. There was praise amongst other high ranking officials of Hamas as well. They all followed by saying its not a major policy shift, which it isn’t, and which was not expected. They reiterated that they are not changing their basic stance on issues but widely welcomed the speech and more praise came for it then opposition, as far as Hamas is concerned.
Really cool interactive on the Obama speech at the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/06/02/us/politics/200900604_OBAMA_CAIRO.html?hp
Like the summary of the whole speech
but being the skeptic tht I am ,would really want actions n not mere sweet talk. We are talking on a mutual level now, just like the west isnt satisfied with the muslim world merely declaring Al Qaida the enemy , and wants substantial action, we feel the same way. First and foremost the very cause of the ‘hostile’ impression tht we get from the west shud be changed.
I dont think that there could be any other way to start than closing down gitmo,charging all involved in torture and giving the detainees a fair trial.
Apologies but cant real see beyond the hostility of gitmo,bargram and abu guraib! its time to act.
On the other hand trying to cling on to some optimism I feel Obama has come out and accepted things that we all really wanted them to. But on the same note most of the muslim world isn’t against the ‘west’ its the policies , we all were witnesses to the protests carried out IN the US by the American people. Our complains being against the policies and certainly not against the ppl in general
Thanks for your comment Sana!
Question to you and everyone else – how do you feel about the term West and the “Muslim World”?
Kalsoom – what a brilliant post!! Well done and what a superb summary. I missed it actually and only read about it later but this post has given me an even bigger insight into what was said by him. Great speech and he I think he tackled many issues and very well articulated. I think it was necessary and I’m glad this was finally done by him!!
> Make no mistake: we do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan. We seek no military bases there.
Hmmm….. Really? Wonder what all that construction they’re payin for is then? Must be farmhouses since it’s not military bases.
> That is why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who have been displaced.
And all that is being spent to beef up the security at our embassy and consulates in the various cities.
> The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.
Why not send an army to stop THIS terrorism??
> And any nation – including Iran – should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
And will America give up its weapons and sign the treaty? Actions sir should follow your words
> no system of government can or should be imposed upon one nation by any other
Yet we will continue to jam Democracy down your throat…
> there are some who advocate for democracy only when they are out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others.
Are the baboons that we call politicians listeing?? He’s talking about u!
> It is easier to start wars than to end them.
That is why US troops are still in Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama is unable to end the war that W started.
Let’s all pray that he puts his money where his mouth is…..
A few points:
* Why is it the job of the US to solve the Israel-Palestine issue? Seriously. We should cut off all aid to Israel and Arab countries and let them figure this out themselves.
* Obama address the “Muslim world” but how can one speak of Muslims monolithically? Does a Malaysian Muslim have the same concerns and perspective as a Moroccan Muslim? We rarely speak of the Jewish/Christian/Buddhist etc. worlds, why the Muslim world?
* The best part of Obama’s speech was this: “The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems.”
Amen. Why Arabs are obsessed with the plight of the Palestinians is beyond me. I’m of Irish heritage — my middle name is Patrick — but I couldn’t care less about the Northern Ireland issue. Not my concern.
The issue is stirred up by Arab governments to suit their own ends: namely directly the hostility of their people against Israel instead of their own governments.
Hi Colin,
First, I do not think the world expects the US to be involved as much as the US government itself WANTS to be involved. I think the stability in the Middle East is of enormous strategic importance to the US and it will not stop intervening till the issues are resolved. If the US did not want to have anything to do with the region, it would have not unnecessarily involved itself in Middle Eastern politics (as Eisenhower did during the 1956 Suez Canal war). Moreover, the US has overtly funded Israel and supplied them weapons, indirectly perpetrating the conflict. So I think the Palestinians do blame the US to an extent.
Second, while I agree with you that Arab leaders (Nasser in particular) have historically used the Palestinian issue onlly to further their own ends, I think now the threat is far more palpable because of the upsurge in Islamic militarism throughout the Middle East. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt created Hamas in Gaza and the Islamic Action Front in Jordan; the greater legitimacy Hamas enjoys, the greater influence the other two parties have as well.
So yes, I do think that the US entrenched itself in the Middle Eastern politics; so the expectation that they will help resolve it, particularly as weapons providers to Israel and founders of the “War on Terror”, is a natural one. What the US needs to do is try to remain as diplomatic as possible – even if it the outcome is a long, protracted agreement. We have learnt from the Oslo Accord that hasty decisions, ultimatums and far-reaching promises without real attitude change will only make the situation worse – as they did with the outbreak of the second intifada in the West Bank & Gaza.
Hi
I am writing an article for Huffington Post. I have few questions. Can you please email me at sarikamona1@gmail.com?
Thanks,
well done Obama, but somehow the impact I wanted to get, I fell short!
wont blame him or the place he chose to put up a display but nevertheless, Change it is!