
CS Monitor: Baitullah Mehsud speaking to reporters in May 2008
On Friday, news agencies released “unconfirmed” reports that Tehreek-e-Taliban head, Baitullah Mehsud, was killed in a U.S. drone strike in South Waziristan early Wednesday. As the day went on, officials released a stream of ambiguous and vague statements. Interior Minister Rehman Malik was quoted saying, “We suspect he was killed in the missile strike…We have some information, but we don’t have material evidence to confirm it.” A senior U.S. official told ABC News, meanwhile, that there was “a 95 percent chance that Mehsud was among those killed in the missile strike.”
Although a Taliban commander and aide later told the Associated Press by phone that Baitullah Mehsud and his wife had been killed in the drone strike [intelligence sources also confirmed this fact, saying his body had already been buried], Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi told reporters that authorities would travel to the site of the death in order to “to be 100 percent sure.” CNN‘s correspondent further noted that Pakistani officials will also conduct a DNA test in order to fully verify this development.
Why the caution? In June, Baitullah Mehsud was reportedly almost killed after he attended a funeral in Waziristan, and a similar report also circulated last September. However, the fact that Mehsud “has shown up alive after previous near-misses,” ultimately undermines Pakistan’s credibility. Therefore, despite officials being nearly 100%, both Pakistani and U.S. officials aren’t taking any chances.
In the aftermath of what is still considered an alleged death, it is important to consider two things: First, who was this shadowy figure, aside from being the leader of the Pakistani Taliban? Secondly, how will his death impact the Taliban and the military’s offensive?
Who Was Baitullah Mehsud?
- The Taliban leader was in his mid-late 30s and hailed from the Mehsud tribe of South Waziristan.
- He was known to suffer from diabetes, an illness that led sources to wrongly claim he died of kidney failure in September.
- The UK Telegraph described him as “physically unimposing,” while the BBC‘s Syed Shoaib Hasan said when he went to interview him in May 2008, “he found himself sitting down before a short, plump, bearded man, reluctant to allow his picture to be taken.”
- Based in South Waziristan, Mehsud proclaimed himself the leader of the TTP in 2007, an umbrella organization that was allied with with North Waziristan Taliban leader Hafiz Gul Bahadar and South Waziristan leader Mullah Nazir to form the Council of United Mujahideen, a group that had pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda and the overall Taliban commander, Mullah Omar.
- The Telegraph noted, “Mehsud became Public Enemy Number One after launching suicide attacks in 2007 against the army and politicians after commandos stormed Islamabad’s Red Mosque.”
-
He is suspected of being behind the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, a charge he denies.
-
Although Mehsud has been linked to numerous attacks like Islamabad’s Marriott Hotel and the Peshawar’s Pearl Continental bombings [officals say he can be linked to 80% of the suicide bombings in Pakistan], he has only personally claimed responsibility for a handful of incidents, including the Lahore police academy attack, one on an Islamabad police station, a suicide bombing on a military convoy in Bannu [all in March], and a shooting at a U.S. immigration center in New York, which killed 13 people. Each of the aforementioned attacks, he noted, were carried out in response to “U.S. drone attacks,” (ironic, then, if he was killed by one of those strikes).
The Impact of Mehsud’s Death
Most officials in U.S. and Pakistan seemed unanimous in saying that Mehsud’s death would be both a tactical and strategic victory against the Pakistani Taliban. Baitullah was adept at connecting various militant groups and organizations, often transcending tribes, borders, and regions to form alliances. Many therefore believe his death will lead to a power struggle, ultimately leading to cracks in the organization. The Christian Science Monitor quoted Roshtam Shah Mohmand, a former NWFP chief secretary, who asserted, “I don’t think the TTP movement would remain intact [without Mehsud]…I think no other leader would have the same charisma, appeal, popularity, and stature.”
However, Juan Cole, author of the Informed Comment, provided a different argument:
Some analysts believe in the centrality of leadership cadres in insurgencies. But I’d just point out that the killing of Abu Musab Zarqawi in Iraq in May of 2006 had no effect whatsoever on fundamentalist guerrilla attacks in that country….Groups like Hamas and the Taliban have a complicated relationship to clans and cliques that easily survive the assassination of even an important leader.
My own assessment tows the line somewhere between Cole’s and the official statements. The TTP and its allies formed a highly decentralized power structure. Given this fact, it is likely that Mehsud’s death will only have a marginal real impact on the organization, particularly since militants are reportedly already meeting to decide on a successor (candidates include his deputy Hakimullah Mehsud, Qari Hussain Mehsud [the commander known to recruit children into the Taliban], North Waziristan leader Hafiz Gul Bahadar, and Bajaur Taliban sub-commander Waliur Rahman). It would be naive to suggest that Mehsud’s death came as a surprise to the Pakistani Taliban – he was, after all, on the top of both the U.S. and Pakistan’s Most Wanted lists. And, noted the BBC, “the Taliban leadership of Afghanistan still remains the major arbiter in settling questions of succession among the Pakistani militant groups.”
At the same time, Mehsud’s death, if confirmed, still represents a pretty hefty symbolic victory for Pakistan. In a war of perceptions, such a fact is significant. Much of the Pakistani military’s tactical success going into South Waziristan remained contingent on taking out high-level targets like Mehsud. Officials must therefore frame his death to show the increasing weakness of the TTP, and the military’s comparative strength, thereby turning a tactical victory into a potential strategic success. However, the Pakistan government also needs to step up and provide services within this vacuum. As Cole noted, “Something like 80% of the time, the only way to defeat an insurgency is to find a political formula acceptable to it…Where it is defeated, isolating it from its recruiting pool is important.”
What are your own thoughts – will Baitullah Mehsud’s death have a major impact on Pakistan’s war on the Taliban, or only a marginal effect?

[...] Interior Minister Rehman Malik was quoted saying, “We […] Read more at: CHUP! – Changing Up Pakistan abc news, baitullah mehsud, cnn, dna test, drone, friday news, intelligence sources, interior [...]
Have to admit I was majorly relieved to hear that Batty had finally been killed. This man was a disgrace not only to our country but to our religion as well.
After hearing the news, I checked CNN, Intl Herald Tribune, BBC, NY Times, Jang, Geo, Dawn, Daily Times but all the sites had the same generic news without providing a summary of who Batty was and all the crimes he had committed during his life.
Your blog has provided the best information I have come across. The concise yet informative bullet points (love the format by the way) providing his background and all the damage he did to our great country was more than what any other news site provided.
While this is an accomplishment for the US and the Pakistani Army we need to be wary because this may just be a temporary set back for the Taliban…
Thanks again for keeping us informed. Keep up the good work. Look forward to checking out your site in the future.
Thanks MR, the bullet points were a friend’s idea, so i can’t take complete credit!
Juan Cole, who I quoted above mentioned Al Qaeda in Iraq when noting that deaths of leaders only act as a minor setback, and remembering back to 2006, I actually do think Zarqawi’s death was an enormous symbolic victory against AQI and the insurgents – and although some may not pinpoint his death as the reason for the organization’s weakening, AQI did appear to weaken soon after, especially with the rise of the Sunni Tribal Awakening.
So maybe this will have a similar impact – I guess we have to wait to find out.
Dawn had this whole section on Baitullah Mehsud and his life story. He was the son of a PeshImam. The good that can come out of this is that the TTP will break up. (Or already has). The division will make them weaker. And there will be no united leader.
We Pakistanis will even come to accept drones now that the top leadership of the TTP might be dead but it would be a mistake for the US to think that Pakistanis accept drones completely.
All in all, this might be good. But it’s just a drop in the bucket.
Ha, just saw the Dawn in-depth look into his life. If only it came out while I was scouring cyberspace piecing together the above details!
Here’s that article Yawar was referring to: http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/07-pesh-imams-son-became-pakistans-most-wanted-militant-ha-04
Yawar, I think you raise an interesting point about the drone strikes – and that seemed to be a question raised among the twitter-verse (I know, such a lame term) when the reports of his death first surfaced. It’s also something I brought up in my piece on drone strikes (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kalsoom-lakhani/drone-attacks-bombs-in-th_b_241439.html)
- If drone strikes take out high-level targets like Baitullah and potentially Mullah Omar – does that change Pakistani on the ground perceptions of U.S. drones? My thought is no, but I’d be interested to hear what others think.
How embarrassing it would be for the Pakistani government if reports of the last few hours turn out to be true: Mehsud is alive, he is in hiding, and will appear for a press conference shortly. Kalsoom, you raise an interesting point regarding how perceptions might be impacted assuming Mehsud was killed in the drone attack. I agree that it probably wouldn’t boost America’s profile in Pakistan. However, if Mehsud is alive, this might further tarnish America’s reputation and place even more pressure on the Pakistani government to stop drone attacks. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
It seems that BBC is reporting he is now alive: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8191105.stm
So if he’s alive, then what about the Shura meeting yesterday of his top commanders where allegdly both (or one) was shot dead by the other?
This could have a reverse impact where the Talib are now solidified under BM’s command.
On the ground, it makes no difference. Here in Karachi, no one cares. If Baitullah’s really dead, it makes no difference to us. The war is still going on in the North and all we in the South can do is turn on our TVs and hear what is going on.
Seriously, life does go on, even if BM’s dead or alive.
Well now, BBC says he’s “ill” while American/Pakistani say he’s dead. Also there was the Shura meeting where 2 ppl were killed, but of course the Taliban says that never happened.
Ahh!
NY Times also reports that he is still alive: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/08/10/world/international-uk-pakistan-taliban-commander.html?_r=1
We have cried wolf far too many times when it comes to his death.
[...] 10, 2009 by Kalsoom This past Friday, news agencies released unconfirmed reports that Baitullah Mehsud was killed in a U.S. air strike in South Waziristan. Come Monday, and the situation is as ambiguous and vague [...]