
Son of a Lion, Carolyn Johnson Productions
Son of a Lion, the feature film debut by Australian filmmaker Benjamin Gilmour, tells the story of a young Pashtun boy Niaz Afridi. Though Niaz is from Pakistan’s tribal weapon-making village of Darra Adam Khel, he defies his father’s expectation to carry on the family’s gun making business by demanding an education. The film, which has drawn critical acclaim at international film festivals and is a 2008 Independent Spirit Award Winner, is significant because it explores the nuances of the Pashtun culture and attempts to break down stereotypes of a group often lumped together with the Taliban. Son of a Lion opens in select theaters in the United Kingdom November 6, [see Mara Pictures for further information]. Below is CHUP’s Q&A with Gilmour:
Q: You went from being a medic on a film set in London to filming your first movie in the dangerous terrain of northwest Pakistan. What inspired you to make the jump into film and why did you choose to go to Pakistan for your first project?
For a few years following the 9/11 attacks in New York, I was working as personal medic to Hollywood celebrities whenever they were in London for film shoots. It was while looking after Sharon Stone that I realized how far I had strayed from my mission in life. Paramedics, like most health professionals, are generally imbued with compassion and a sense of justice. Did I train for five years to dish out headache tablets to famous people? The vacuousness, materialism and selfishness of the world in which I inhabited began to frustrate me and I knew my calling was far greater.
In addition to this, having traveled as a tourist in Pakistan in August 2001, I had been deeply touched by the country. Immediately after crossing into Pakistan from India, my wife and I were overwhelmed by the difference in attitudes towards us. We were struck by the kindness and generosity of Pakistanis, whatever their ethnicity. In particular, when we ended up in Peshawar to shop for textiles, we were impressed by the extreme hospitality and good nature of the Pashtuns. A year later, the memory of ‘gupshup’ with the Pashtuns chased me on the film sets of London. The terrorist attacks in NYC had set off a wave of Islamaphobia and outright Muslim hatred in the West, perpetuated by governments and media outlets who ought to have been less hysterical. I was angry and it spurred me into thinking about way in which I could balance out the stigmas and fear-mongering. Being exposed to film as I was at that time convinced me that film as medium had tremendous power to influence people worldwide. This is how film became my weapon to fight Islamaphobia and misconceptions of Pashtuns.
Q: The film, Son of a Lion, goes beyond just touching upon a father-son narrative and really delves into the Pashtun identity, which is significant given the many misconceptions that exist about this group. How did you go about befriending the Pathans you met in the area and how were they part of the creative process of the film?
Shooting this film was a great lesson to me about the Pashtun psyche. This film is a drama, not a documentary, so I needed to find actors willing to participate and there was a great deal of reluctance at first. Film is not generally a medium considered by conservative types in FATA as something acceptable. Judging by some of the Pashto films in the market, I can understand why. But film does not have to include negative and damaging information. Indeed, if film is used by the right people in the right way for the common good of humanity, it can be beautiful and uplifting. Even the Taliban and Al Qaeda have YouTube accounts and make films for Al Jazeera! In no way did I want ‘Son of a Lion’ to be a Western perspective of Pathans. This would be too obvious and has already been done by too many ignorant news stations and I despise it. For the film to be a real glimpse of Pashtun mentality, I knew I needed actors who would improvise.
Befriending a Pathan is not easy as an outsider as they are notoriously suspicious about the intentions of Westerners. This comes as no surprise after so many Western nations have tried to control them, failing dismally each time. For me it took months of waiting in Lahore, teaching film at IQRA University and then countless cups of tea with contacts in Peshawar and villagers in Orakzai trying to convince them to help me. I mean, by the end of pre-production I needed a bladder transplant, that’s how much tea I had to drink for this film!
When I mentioned the word ‘honor‘, the fact I could not return to Australia without a feature film, most of the Pathans felt obliged to assist me I suppose, thanks to Paktunwali. Nevertheless, I believe they were genuinely convinced I wanted to represent them in the best possible light and saw this film as platform to show the world who they were as a people. When those who are frustrated and angry do not have a proper platform to express themselves, they often resort to violence and I think this is part of the problem in FATA. Pashtun tribes have not been consulted about the best way forward in dealing with militancy in their midst. Musharraf‘s negotiation’s with the tribes doesn’t count, as he was also pandering to Taliban. The real Pashtun voice is rarely heard in the Western media. In making this film, I was offering locals a chance to send the world a message in the form of an entertaining drama.
As a consequence, each actor was given the freedom to make up their own dialogues, to help shape the whole story, and to bring their own material to the process continuously. We see news footage of the security situation daily. What we don’t see are the feelings of Pashtuns. My story was about challenging misconceptions about a group with whom we are quite unnecessarily at war with.
Q: Your film tells the story of 11-year-old Niaz who lives with his father Sher Alam Afridi in a small town, where for generations the local population has earned its living by producing weapons. Niaz, however, wants to receive an education. This is such an important message – what do you hope audiences will take away from the film?
The real message in this film is, I believe, that when it comes to ‘change’ in the world of Pashtuns, its a very slow-burning evolution. One cannot say to a Pashtun, ‘Look, we think you should join the wider Pakistan, lose your autonomy and modernize or we’ll send in the army’. It just won’t work. In the film, Niaz sees the value of an education that includes science, languages, mathematics and so on. Although these subjects can be part of madrassa curriculum, in the FATA they tend to be left out. Niaz, as the son of a Pashtun, challenges his traditionalist father, which is a big thing in this culture to do. The boy wants an education and his father wants him to carry on in his gun factory. The only individual on earth who can possibly change a father’s way of thinking is perhaps his own son. This is the message, that when it comes to Pathans, any change must come from within, must be between father and son, mother and daughter, brother and sister to be effective. It cannot be enforced by outsiders like the Pakistani Army or NATO or US predator drones. True change will never come at the barrel of a gun.
Q: Have the people in the villages you filmed in seen the film? What was their reaction?
Yes, those in the villages and towns where Son of a Lion was shot have seen it and were thrilled. One or two were unhappy with the fact that I made a comparison between madrassa and government schools. Of course, I don’t have any problems with madrassas at all, I believe that in the absence of properly-functioning government schools, a madrassa is often the best option so long as it does not advocate violence. I do however believe in a well-rounded education and this means that in addition to religious instruction every child is entitled to satiate their inquisitive minds about life and nature and health, to learn skills for future employment opportunities and most importantly, to understand their human rights.
So let’s have madrassas in FATA with a wider curriculum. All those involved in the film are, above all, ecstatic there is a film depicting them not as murderous extremists but as innocent men, women and children caught in the middle of a greater game in which they are but victims, pleading for a little understanding and compassion from the outside world. One day, they hope, we will see them for who they really are.

I’m sorry if this seems provocative–I assure you that I say it in a cool-minded way, meant for thought, not provocation. But, here goes–why do the Punjabi/Sindhi Pakistanis feel closer to/politically inclined towards the Pashtuns than to Indians? That is giving (IMHO) too much weight to historical contingencies/Britisher intervention in setting boundaries, etc. Pashtuns are found within the borders of the Pakistani state, so of course they should be treated fairly as Pakistani citizens, yet–to the extent Pakistan orients itself towards the Iranian-type Pashtuns rather than the desis, it is furthering the divide between Pakistan and India. Is this in the long-term interest of Pakistan? Is it historically accurate? (I.e., aren’t Punjab/Sindh historically part of the sub-continent?) Just food for thought. . . .
Ravi,
I think the point is that the rest of Pakistan feels very separated from Pashtuns in Pakistan. We could go into an entire discussion about how Punjabis in Pakistan have more in common with Punjabis in India than Sindis in their own country, I think.
It’s really hard to make sweeping generalizations of all Pathans though. Pathans in FATA have a completely different national experience than those who live in Pakistan’s major cities. So while I can see your argument, I think it’s hard to say that today, 60 years after Partition, that Pakistan shouldn’t be oriented towards a major ethnic group within its borders.
Also, I think the recent designation of “AfPak” and the shift towards our western border (in terms of the offensive and the Taliban presence, not necessarily troop levels) has also furthered this orientation.
[...] expectation to carry on the family’s gun making business […] Read more at: CHUP! – Changing Up Pakistan 9 11 attacks, afridi, carolyn johnson, chup, critical acclaim, dangerous terrain, darra, [...]
Great work Kalsoom.
I was close to tears reading this. Must watch this film!
What a great interview! I wasn’t aware of this movie, but I am glad that I am in the UK so that I can see it when it comes out next week!
I love it when you cover such things. So awesome. Thank you for showing another face of Pakistan, Kals.
Thanks everyone. Most thanks goes to Benjamin for making such an incredible film and really taking the time to answer my questions. Thanks also to Sanam at Mara Pictures who set this whole thing up!
Hi Kalsoom,
I have not lately come to your blog- the events in Pakistan/Afghanistan have been proceeding at such a pace, its difficult to keep up and after a while fatigue sets in! I guess its a pivotal moment going on right now with the Army offensive…
But I wonder how come you have not covered two important events/stories of last 2-3 days:
1. Hillary’s visit and the sparks its causing
2. NYTimes story 2 days back that CIA has been paying Hamid Karzai’s brother- a kingpin in the drug trafficking, hence undermining US claim to want to stamp out drug issue there. I guess its typical- several agencies working at cross purposes- CIA doing as it has always, by hook or crook, achieve its short term objectives- like buying influence or access. But if that story was true, it undermines Obama admin’s efforts to give more legitimacy to US efforts…
Thanks for coming back Pravar,
I was actually writing about the Hillary visit when you left your comment. It’s not easy having a job AND running this blog given the amount of events that happened week after week in Pakistan. Re: the Afghanistan story, it’s pretty interesting, and it would be great if u left that as a comment on my post a few days ago (on the Opium issue), but try to keep CHUP pretty focused on Pakistan. Thanks!
i didnt watch this movie…ll try soon
Any chance you’ve seen this yet? Wonder where it will be shown in DC…