
The working girls of Mad Men.
This past weekend, the NY Times published a video report by Adam Ellick, which delved into the growing number of lower-class women in Karachi entering Pakistan’s service industry. In the accompanying article, he wrote, “The women are pressed into the work force not by nascent feminism but by inflation, which has spiked to 12.7 percent from 1.4 percent in the past seven years. As a result, one salary — the man’s salary — can no longer feed a family.”
In the last five years, the female employment at fast food chain KFC has risen 125 percent. KFC Pakistan CEO Rafiq Rangoonwala told Ellick, “It’s not just the economic need, but need of the nation. Otherwise, Pakistan will never progress. We’ll always remain a third-world country because 15 percent of the people cannot feed 85 percent of the population.”
The story is interesting because of its commentary on women’s foray into the workplace, how employment leads to economic empowerment, and how this subsequent independence is considered a threat to the gender status quo. It is the age old power struggle. In the case of these Pakistani women in the service industry, they have faced constant resistance from “harassing customers and disapproving male relatives,” as well as much more conservative traditional and religious values. One woman told Ellick that her brother’s biggest stance is, “Our sisters don’t leave the house, God forbid they get ahead of us, or that they earn so much that we don’t have any importance…”
These women are therefore walking a thin line between earning a living and challenging societal norms, facing constant opposition from men who are threatened by this growth and continuing to view them as objects. Ellick noted that some KFC female employees were reluctant to smile for fear that male customers would think they “were easy,” while other men may label female workers as prostitutes or worse. Such perceptions are damaging, resulting in broken engagements and numerous safety concerns. In fact, one customer was so taken by a female worker’s smile, noted Ellick, that “he followed her out the door and tried to force her into his car.”

From the NY Times
This issue is certainly present in this society, but it’s also a universal problem. How many times have we all heard, read, or seen stories of rape or assault in which the victim has been blamed for her clothing choice, her profession, or the way she looked overall? How many times have we heard the phrase, “She was asking for it?” In the case of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange and the rape allegations in Sweden, he shockingly considers himself a victim of “revolutionary feminism,” even noting that one of the women was wearing a “revealing pink cashmere sweater.” No words, [though check out this great piece over at New Wave Feminism, "The Handy Guide to Not Raping People in Seven Easy Steps."]
If you’ve been watching the Pakistani news over the past few weeks, then you also heard that very statement uttered by police officers and Sharmila Farooqi (see Sana Saleem’s brilliant open letter here), after a young woman in Karachi was gang raped. Rather than siding with the victim and protecting her privacy, Farooqi revealed her identity and proceeded to malign her character based on irrelevant details, causing the girl to withdraw the case.
Such attitudes are infuriating and ignorant, and further perpetuate the cycle of gender-based violence and discrimination. In television shows like Mad Men, set in an advertising agency in the 1960s, the evolution of women in the work place in the U.S. is continuously illustrated and is a reminder of how universal these issues are. In Pakistan, as Ellick noted, employers are reluctant to hire this growing generation of lower class women because of the subsequent investment, though supermarket chain Makro currently spends $8000/month on offering free transit services for its female workers, “to protect them from harassment and to help persuade them take jobs where they may face hostility.” As a result, Makro’s female employment has quadrupled since 2006.
Other employers are reluctant to hire women because of the high turnover rate, particularly given the expectation that many stop working after they get married. Again, a familiar scenario, not that different to the evolution of workplaces in the West or even among women working in higher-end jobs in Pakistan (though obviously the cultural and religious nuances add more layers to this situation). It is a constant struggle and debate about entrenched gender roles and how, as women become more economically empowered, the status quo begins to shift. Therefore, it is important to note the intrinsic link between economics and feminism (via empowerment).
Zeenat Hisam, a senior researcher at the Pakistan Institute of Labor Education and Research told the NY Times, “We’re a society in transition. Men in Pakistan haven’t changed, and they’re not changing as fast as our women. Men want to keep their power in their hand.” The question of course remains, is how to reconcile these differences in order to preserve such modes of empowerment without endangering these women’s safety – at home and in the work place.

Excellent post! It’s like you’re reiterating everything I was thinking!
p.s. stumbled upon your blog a few weeks ago and I’m really liking it.
Thank you
Hope you continue to stop by!
“one customer was so taken by a female worker’s smile, noted Ellick, that “he followed her out the door and tried to force her into his car.”
–> I blame Segregation of the sexes for this. Recent studies show that Men and Women belong to the same species!!
Although these kind of crimes happen every where but the frequency is more in Conservative societies.
When men are not used to seeing Women in public much, they see her as an object of desire and lust rather than another Human Being.
[...] the family but also the society, for which I think I don’t need to say much as the post by CHUP and nytimes has already said much. Same is the case with Shazia: her family was at first too [...]
Even if you walked naked some blocks and smiled, no one would have a reason to rape you. It’s kind of difficult to imagine a logic which justifies it.
I’m just glad some companies (like Makro) are helping the transition. The smile of the girl in the Mc Donalds picture is just great. [Not so sure about the Julian Assange case, though.]
Great post. [I'm following you from Mexico City.]
I found the remarks by the owner of Espresso to be the most interesting though – esp. since you’d assume they cater to a more privileged, elite crowd of people that they themselves would be progressive. Ironic, no?
This is a really interesting related piece on working part-time (both men & women in The Netherlands) that was in the Intl Herald Tribune today:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/30/world/europe/30iht-dutch30.html?_r=1&ref=global-home
“For reasons that blend tradition and modernity, three in four working Dutch women work part time. Female-dominated sectors like health and education operate almost entirely on job-sharing as even childless women and mothers of grown children trade income for time off. That has exacted an enduring price on women’s financial independence.”
The original article read that the girls’ men were worried about the immodest ( read short sleeved ) dress that she was wearing. But after seeing the above photo, I do not know what all the hoopla is about.
I know… I know… it is a culture thing. I dare not think what Indian moral brigade’s reaction would be were a Hooters to open in New Delhi. But given that we have a shared culture, I was thinking that may be we would have a shred threshold.
All said, one thing that I have to agree is that letting 50% of a country’s productive workforce sit idle is a criminal waste. It was WWII that brought the American women into the mainstream workforce. Hope that the bleak happenings in Pakistan end up have such a similar silver lining.
Really great point about WWII Pradeep – and cheers for the comment!