Last week’s poll, probing who readers thought were responsible for Benazir’s assassination, is now closed. The results? Of the 70 people who answered, 47% believed Al Qaeda/Taliban was behind the attack, while 27% felt that government agencies had a hand in the killing. While 17% voted other, only 8% believed the government was behind the assassination. Just to put these results in perspective, the recent Gallup Pakistan poll [see January 14th post] found that nearly half of the 1,300 Pakistanis surveyed believed that government agencies or government-linked politicians were responsible for Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, while only 17% believed the military/government’s assertions that Al Qaeda and/or the Taliban were involved.This week’s poll asks CHUP! readers what they feel is the most immediate concern facing Pakistan. While I concede that the survey choices may be simplistic and may not fully grasp the depth of the country’s problems, it still aims to gauge reader opinion and break down the most immediate issues in Pakistan. Please take a moment to participate, and remember the key word is immediate, not long-term.
Email CHUP
Blog Stats
- 802,072 hits
CHUP Categories
- Backgrounders (32)
- Contributions (69)
- Events (17)
- Interviews (43)
- Jackie's Guest Posts (6)
- Media (7)
- News Briefs (308)
- Op-Eds (197)
- Polls (3)
- Uncategorized (4)
-
Recent Posts
Top Posts
Archives
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Recent Comments
Ehmad on Pakistan Goes to the Osca… Pakistan Chat on Who Watches the Watchmen? Amina on Pakistan: Unity, Faith Discipl… heart2woman on The Comic Book Dudes of Kachee… Muhammad Shah on The 1971 Chronicles: The State… Tweet, Tweet
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
-
-
-
-
The difference between the CHUP and Gallup polls is interesting, but not surprising–this is an excellent example of just how much power a country’s media can have over its population. For the most part, the media in Pakistan (while I was in Islamabad in Dec/Jan, at least) were highly critical of the situation, making sure to point out the flaws in the government’s many responses to BB’s assassination. Conspiracy theory or not, it was clear that the popular feeling was that the government and/or the ISI was behind the assassination. News channels like Dawn, however, were very good in their coverage of the situation, making sure to cover all angles and not get carried away with the theories flying around the country.
In contrast, the American and UK governments seem set on placing the blame solely with AQ/Taliban/Islamic fundamentalists. The CIA seems dead certain on Baitullah Mehsud being the mastermind of the attack, and the media–especially the US media–have decided to run with this story, not at all exploring the fact that Mehsud publicly denied involvement the day after the famous phone transcript was released. Of course, his statement could be lies, and it’s certainly possible that terrorist groups could have been behind the attack. But, the Western media refuses to explore other theories, mainly because this particular theory is so convenient for the US government–it gives them another tangible force to point fingers at and revive hope that we can win the “War on Terror”. For all the facts and figures presented by the media, it feels vaguely like we’re back to the 1898 world of jingoistic, yellow journalism. Less pronounced, of course, but where are the other voices and stories?
This isn’t the first time the Western media has taken a different stance than the media in Pakistan–think of the Western media’s portrayal of BB herself. My work colleagues here in the UK and my friends in the US had no idea of the corruption accusations against her. I’m sure by doing a little digging, they could have unearthed some stories presenting the whole story, but the fact is that the mainstream Western media portrayed her as some sort of saviour of Pakistan. Why do the Western media outlets look the other way from the Pakistani ones? Are they not established enough? Are they not professional enough? Can we not trust them? Or are they running with stories that are against the US agenda?
Lastly, I’m not saying that everyone who voted in the CHUP poll was influenced by their country’s media–obviously, we are all intelligent people who can make our own informed decisions. But, if we distributed the CHUP poll to a sample of average Americans/Brits and then compared the results with the Gallup poll, I’m sure we would see a clear split between the theorised responsible party and the stories printed in those countries’ media outlets.
What I am saying, is that a balanced perspective is always needed–just because they are established, doesn’t mean the Western media giants are always presenting the full story. There’s a good mix of Western and Non-Western sources on this blog (though I’d like to see more non-Western sources i.e. Dawn, Al Jazeera English, etc), Kalsoom, and I hope you continue to keep it that way as the traffic grows.
You know its a bad situation when in parts of the country you need to leave the house to get food (which you can’t afford) but you are scared bc you aren’t sure if the militants want to kill you or the agencies.
I’m sorry for the pessimism and hopelessness– but it seems to be a recurring theme amongst Pakistani’s, young and old, these days